Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada: Which Small SUV Wins?

Shopping for a small SUV in Canada can feel a little like standing in front of a wall of winter jackets: almost everything looks capable at first glance, yet the details determine whether we end up comfortable or regretting our choice halfway through February.

That is exactly where the Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada comparison gets interesting.

Both are compact, urban-friendly crossovers aimed at Canadians who want SUV practicality without moving into a larger, thirstier vehicle. Both can be equipped with all-wheel drive, both seat five, and both offer surprisingly modern cabins for their size. Yet once we start looking beneath the surface, they have noticeably different personalities.

The 2026 Nissan Kicks leans heavily toward efficiency, practicality, technology, and value. Its 2.0-litre four-cylinder produces 141 horsepower, AWD is available on select trims, and Nissan advertises up to 1,699 litres of cargo room with the rear seats folded.

The 2026 Hyundai Kona, meanwhile, feels like the more ambitious vehicle. Its standard 2.0-litre engine produces 147 horsepower, while Canadian N Line versions step up to a much stronger turbocharged 1.6-litre engine producing 190 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque. It also offers as much as 1,803 litres of cargo volume with the seats folded.

So, which one deserves a spot in our driveway?

For most Canadians, the Hyundai Kona is the better all-around SUV, particularly if performance, refinement, cargo space, and highway driving matter. However, the Nissan Kicks makes an extremely persuasive argument for buyers prioritizing fuel economy, simple everyday usability, technology, and affordability.

Let's break down where each one wins.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada: Quick Comparison

Before diving deeper, here is the basic picture.

Category	Hyundai Kona	Nissan Kicks
Base engine	2.0L 4-cylinder	2.0L 4-cylinder
Base horsepower	147 hp	141 hp
Available turbo engine	Yes, 190 hp	No
FWD	Yes	Yes
AWD	Available	Available
Maximum cargo space	Approx. 1,803 L	Up to 1,699 L
Seating	5	5
Best trait	Performance and versatility	Value and efficiency
Best for	Mixed city/highway use	Urban commuting
Overall winner	Hyundai Kona	—

The Kicks certainly isn't outclassed. In fact, its latest generation has become considerably more competitive. Nissan gives the 2026 Kicks available Intelligent AWD, Snow Mode on AWD versions, standard heated front seats, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a standard 12.3-inch touchscreen.

Still, the Kona stretches the definition of a budget subcompact SUV further toward compact-SUV territory.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Price in Canada

Price can completely change our perception of these two vehicles.

Hyundai Canada lists the 2026 Kona with an MSRP starting at $26,749 before additional fees, while its displayed purchase price is higher once applicable fees are added.

Nissan Canada currently advertises the 2026 Kicks from roughly $27,198, although exact transaction pricing varies by trim, freight, fees, incentives, province, and dealer.

That means these two are genuine competitors rather than vehicles merely sharing the same general category.

Which Gives Us More for the Money?

The Kicks makes its strongest case when we stay relatively close to the lower end of the lineup. Standard equipment is generous, especially considering heated front seats and wireless smartphone connectivity are included across the range.

Hyundai's advantage appears as we move upward.

The Kona lineup allows us to spend more money and actually receive significantly more capability, particularly with the turbocharged N Line. Instead of simply adding cosmetic equipment, Hyundai offers a genuine performance upgrade.

That gives the Kona a broader buying spectrum.

Value Winner: Nissan Kicks

If our mission is simply to get a nicely equipped new crossover while controlling monthly payments, the Kicks deserves serious consideration.

If we're willing to pay more for additional performance and versatility, the Kona eventually pulls ahead.

Exterior Design: Kona Looks Futuristic, Kicks Looks Tougher

Design is subjective, obviously, but these SUVs approach styling from opposite directions.

The Hyundai Kona looks as though someone shrunk a futuristic EV into an urban crossover. Its lighting signature, smooth surfaces, wide stance, and angular detailing make it unusually distinctive.

The current Nissan Kicks moved away from the narrow, tall hatchback appearance of its predecessor. It now appears broader, squarer, and considerably more substantial.

Where the Kona whispers, "technology," the Kicks says, "tiny adventure vehicle."

Which One Will Age Better?

We suspect the Nissan's relatively conventional proportions could age gracefully.

The Kona is more dramatic. Some buyers will love that. Others may consider it overly styled.

Neither vehicle looks cheap anymore, though, and that matters. Small SUVs used to resemble economy hatchbacks wearing hiking boots. These two finally look like products people might choose rather than settle for.

Engine Performance: The Kona Has the Clear Advantage

This is one of the most important differences in our Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada comparison.

Nissan Kicks Engine

Every current Kicks uses a naturally aspirated 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine producing 141 horsepower and 140 lb-ft of torque, paired with Nissan's Xtronic continuously variable transmission.

For commuting, this is perfectly adequate.

The Kicks doesn't feel asleep at the wheel, but neither does it give us much incentive to search for an empty on-ramp.

Acceleration is built around economy rather than excitement.

Hyundai Kona Engine

The standard Kona uses a 2.0-litre four-cylinder making 147 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque.

That doesn't sound dramatically stronger than the Nissan because it isn't.

The game changes with the Kona N Line.

Its turbocharged 1.6-litre four-cylinder makes 190 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque and works with an eight-speed automatic rather than the base model's IVT.

That extra muscle makes highway merging, passing slower traffic, and climbing grades considerably easier.

Performance Winner: Hyundai Kona

It isn't particularly close.

If our driving rarely extends beyond city streets, the difference matters less. But anyone frequently travelling Canada's highways will appreciate the Kona turbo's deeper reserve of power.

Fuel Economy: Nissan Kicks Fights Back

Power isn't everything.

Fuel costs have a funny way of reminding us of that every time we stop at the pump.

Nissan says the 2026 Kicks can return roughly 8.1 L/100 km city and 6.6 L/100 km highway in its most efficient configuration, although specific ratings vary by drivetrain and configuration.

Hyundai Canada lists the Kona Essential FWD at approximately 8.1 L/100 km city, 6.8 L/100 km highway, and 7.5 L/100 km combined.

Those numbers are remarkably close.

What Happens With AWD?

Adding AWD usually increases fuel consumption because we're carrying extra mechanical hardware and sending power through more components.

Therefore, buyers focused primarily on economy should think carefully before checking the AWD box.

For Vancouver commuters who rarely leave plowed pavement, quality winter tires on a FWD vehicle may make more financial sense than AWD.

For drivers in Alberta, Quebec, northern Ontario, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, or rural Atlantic Canada, AWD can be easier to justify.

Fuel Economy Winner: Nissan Kicks, Slightly

The difference isn't enormous, but the Kicks has a small efficiency edge depending on configuration.

You might be interested in this content.Hyundai Kona Versus Subaru Crosstrek: Which Small SUV Is Better?

Winter Driving in Canada

This category matters far more here than it does in many international comparisons.

Both SUVs can be equipped with AWD, which already makes them more attractive to Canadian shoppers.

Nissan's available Intelligent AWD continuously monitors conditions and can react when additional traction is needed. AWD versions also offer Snow Mode, designed specifically to adjust vehicle behaviour for slippery surfaces.

Nissan also quotes approximately 8.4 inches of ground clearance for the Kicks, giving it useful breathing room when navigating snow accumulation.

The Kona AWD also provides useful additional clearance compared with front-drive variants.

Does AWD Mean We Can Skip Winter Tires?

Absolutely not.

AWD helps us accelerate.

Winter tires help us accelerate, corner, and—most importantly—stop.

Think of AWD as an extra pair of hands pushing us through the snow. Winter tires are the boots actually touching the ground.

For Canadian winters, we'd rather have FWD with excellent winter tires than AWD wearing mediocre all-seasons.

Winter Winner: Tie

The Kicks scores points for Snow Mode and impressive clearance, while the Kona delivers a confident AWD setup and more available power.

Either can become an excellent winter companion when fitted with proper tires.

Interior Space and Passenger Comfort

The newest Kicks is far roomier than its predecessor, and Nissan emphasizes its Zero Gravity seating design.

Every 2026 Kicks includes heated front seats, while Nissan also equips the rear outboard positions with its Zero Gravity seat philosophy.

That's especially appealing for commuters spending an hour or more crawling through traffic.

The Kona's cabin feels broader and slightly more substantial. Rear-seat space is respectable, and the relatively boxy roofline prevents passengers from feeling squeezed into the back.

Which Is Better for Families?

Both can accommodate a small family.

However, we'd lean toward the Kona if rear-facing child seats, strollers, larger grocery runs, or frequent road trips are part of everyday life.

The Kicks remains practical, but the Kona feels one size more mature.

Passenger Space Winner: Hyundai Kona

Not by a landslide, but the Kona feels better suited to duties beyond basic commuting.

Cargo Space: Kona Wins the Numbers Game

Cargo flexibility is one of the strongest reasons to buy either model instead of a sedan.

Nissan advertises up to 1,699 litres of cargo capacity with the Kicks' rear seats folded. It also provides a wide cargo opening and a maximum cargo length of roughly 1,414 mm.

That's excellent for such a small footprint.

The Kona goes further.

Canadian automotive testing and specification data put its cargo capacity at approximately 723 litres behind the rear seats and 1,803 litres with them folded.

Why Cargo Shape Matters More Than Numbers

Litres don't tell the whole story.

A square box can be more usable than a strangely shaped compartment with technically greater capacity.

Both SUVs make good use of vertical space and folding rear seats, but the Kona's combination of volume and relatively boxy proportions gives it the edge.

Cargo Winner: Hyundai Kona

The Nissan is impressive. The Hyundai is simply larger.

Technology: Nissan Kicks Is Surprisingly Strong

This might be the category where the Kicks surprises us most.

The 2026 model includes a standard 12.3-inch touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay, and wireless Android Auto. Higher trims can add dual 12.3-inch displays, wireless charging, and a Bose Personal Plus audio system with speakers incorporated into the front headrests.

That is serious equipment for an entry-level crossover.

Hyundai Kona Technology

The Kona also delivers a modern digital cockpit, large-screen availability, smartphone integration, and an interface that generally feels polished.

Hyundai has become exceptionally good at bringing features once reserved for expensive models into affordable vehicles.

Which Interface Is Easier to Live With?

Both are competitive, but Nissan deserves credit for making a large touchscreen standard.

Hyundai's interface may look more cohesive depending on trim, while Nissan's arrangement feels straightforward and accessible.

Technology Winner: Tie

The Kona looks sophisticated, but the Kicks provides an impressive amount of technology without demanding that we climb all the way to the top trim.

Safety Features

Modern subcompact SUVs have become remarkably sophisticated in this category.

Nissan equips every 2026 Kicks with Safety Shield 360, while available technologies include ProPILOT Assist and the Intelligent Around View Monitor.

Its driver-assistance suite includes technologies such as automatic emergency braking with pedestrian and cyclist detection, rear automatic braking, blind-spot warning, rear cross-traffic alert, lane-departure warning, and high-beam assist.

The Kona likewise offers a broad Hyundai SmartSense driver-assistance package depending on trim.

Which Is Safer?

We wouldn't pick either vehicle solely based on the number of icons appearing in a brochure.

Driver-assistance systems vary by trim and should support an attentive driver rather than replace one.

The meaningful takeaway is that both offer safety technology that would have looked luxurious in this segment just a few years ago.

Safety Winner: Tie

Both are highly competitive.

Driving Experience Around Canadian Cities

Toronto traffic, Vancouver parking garages, Montreal side streets, Calgary suburbs—this is where these SUVs earn their keep.

Both are easy to manoeuvre.

Both provide SUV-style visibility without feeling enormous.

And both fit into parking spaces that would make a midsize three-row SUV driver start bargaining with the universe.

Why the Kicks Works So Well in Town

Its modest power doesn't matter much at urban speeds.

You might be interested in this content.Hyundai Kona vs Kia Niro Canada: Which Small SUV Is Better?

The CVT keeps operation smooth, visibility is good, and fuel consumption stays relatively restrained.

Its relatively high seating position also gives us some SUV confidence without adding unnecessary bulk.

Why the Kona Feels More Mature

The Kona feels more planted.

Its broader range of available equipment and stronger optional engine give it the personality of a small compact SUV rather than an economy car stretched vertically.

City Winner: Nissan Kicks

The Kicks' simplicity and efficiency make tremendous sense in dense urban environments.

Highway Driving: Kona Pulls Away

Merge onto Highway 401 with four adults and luggage and our priorities change quickly.

This is where available horsepower becomes useful rather than entertaining.

The standard Kona and Kicks are both adequate, but neither transforms passing into an event worth remembering.

The 190-hp turbo Kona does.

It has considerably more torque and avoids the strained sensation that naturally aspirated subcompact SUVs can exhibit when climbing hills or accelerating at highway speeds.

Which Is Quieter?

Road and wind noise depend heavily on pavement, tires, trim, and speed.

Generally, however, the Kona feels closer to the next class up.

Highway Winner: Hyundai Kona

Frequent road-trippers should strongly favour the Kona, particularly the turbo version.

Transmission: IVT vs CVT vs Traditional Automatic

The Nissan Kicks uses an Xtronic continuously variable transmission.

Most naturally aspirated Konas use Hyundai's IVT, which operates on broadly similar efficiency-focused principles.

The turbo Kona is different because Hyundai pairs it with an eight-speed automatic transmission.

Which Feels Better?

For gentle commuting, modern CVTs are perfectly acceptable.

During hard acceleration, however, they can hold engine revs relatively high while road speed catches up. Some drivers don't care. Others dislike the elastic feeling.

The turbo Kona's conventional automatic provides a more familiar sense of gears changing.

Transmission Winner: Hyundai Kona N Line

For driving enjoyment, it's the configuration we'd choose.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Reliability

Reliability is difficult to predict for brand-new vehicles because long-term data obviously doesn't exist yet for a 2026 model.

What we can do is examine the mechanical complexity of each vehicle.

The standard versions of both use naturally aspirated 2.0-litre four-cylinder engines. That generally means fewer performance-related components than the Kona's turbocharged 1.6-litre option.

The Nissan's CVT may concern some shoppers familiar with historical Nissan CVT discussions, although current systems should not automatically be judged by experiences with older generations.

Similarly, the turbo Kona produces much more power but introduces additional components and heat compared with its naturally aspirated sibling.

Which Would We Choose for Maximum Simplicity?

Probably the naturally aspirated Kona or Kicks.

Proper maintenance matters far more than internet folklore.

Oil changes, fluid service, corrosion protection, tire care, and avoiding years of neglected maintenance can make a dramatic difference in Canadian conditions.

Reliability Verdict: Too Early to Declare a Winner

For buyers keeping a vehicle for ten years, simpler trims may be the safest philosophical choice regardless of badge.

Maintenance Costs in Canada

Routine costs should be fairly manageable for both.

We're dealing with mainstream manufacturers, common four-cylinder engines, widely available dealer networks, and popular tire sizes depending on trim.

Higher-spec wheels can increase replacement tire costs substantially, however.

That's worth remembering before choosing the biggest wheels simply because they look good in the showroom.

Canadian Ownership Tip

If long-term affordability matters, we'd prioritize:

• A sensible wheel and tire package
• Full maintenance records
• Rust protection where appropriate
• High-quality winter tires
• Regular fluid inspections
• Avoiding unnecessary oversized wheels

The least glamorous version of a vehicle can sometimes be the smartest one to own for eight years.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks for Students and First-Time Buyers

The Nissan Kicks makes an especially strong case here.

It's approachable, economical, easy to park, well equipped, and doesn't tempt us into buying more engine than we need.

Insurance costs vary dramatically by province, postal code, driver history, age, coverage, and trim, so we shouldn't assume one vehicle will automatically be cheaper.

Still, a modestly equipped Kicks is conceptually an excellent first SUV.

When the Kona Makes More Sense

If we're expecting our lifestyle to change—longer commutes, children, road trips, ski weekends—the Kona gives us more room to grow.

First-Time Buyer Winner: Nissan Kicks

Its entire personality suits simple, economical transportation.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks for Families

Small family?

Either works.

Growing family?

Kona.

Its stronger cargo figures and more mature highway manners matter more once we're carrying people plus everything people insist on carrying.

A stroller, groceries, diaper bags, winter coats, backpacks, sports gear, and one mysteriously enormous stuffed animal can turn a supposedly spacious crossover into a game of automotive Tetris.

Family Winner: Hyundai Kona

Its extra versatility earns the point.

Which Is Better for Long Canadian Road Trips?

Here we'd choose the Kona again.

The Kicks offers excellent efficiency and comfortable Zero Gravity seats, which absolutely shouldn't be overlooked.

You might be interested in this content.Hyundai Kona vs Mazda CX-30 Canada: Which Small SUV Should We Buy?

But long-distance driving magnifies engine performance, cargo space, passing power, cabin refinement, and stability.

Those areas favour Hyundai.

What About Fuel Costs?

The Kicks may save a little fuel.

Yet for someone driving hundreds of kilometres at a time, we'd accept a modest fuel penalty in exchange for the turbo Kona's additional flexibility.

Road Trip Winner: Hyundai Kona

Especially in N Line specification.

Can the Nissan Kicks or Hyundai Kona Tow?

This is important.

Nissan explicitly states that the 2026 Kicks is not rated for towing and is not recommended for pulling a trailer.

Anyone regularly towing should therefore look elsewhere.

The Kona is also not the vehicle we'd choose if trailering is a meaningful requirement. Buyers needing regular towing capability should move into a larger compact or midsize SUV specifically rated for the load they intend to pull.

For bikes, skis, or roof-mounted equipment, accessory solutions make more sense.

Kona vs Kicks AWD: Which Should Canadians Choose?

If we're buying specifically because we want AWD, this comparison becomes closer.

Nissan's AWD system is one of the features that transformed the newest Kicks into a much more serious competitor. Earlier generations were fundamentally urban economy crossovers. The current vehicle feels more Canadian-friendly.

Snow Mode also gives Nissan a nice psychological—and practical—advantage.

The Kona counters with greater available power and a well-established AWD configuration across much of its Canadian lineup.

Our Choice

For snowy city commuting, Kicks AWD.

For snowy highways and mixed driving, Kona AWD.

The distinction is subtle but useful.

Pros and Cons of the Hyundai Kona

Kona Advantages

• Strong optional 190-hp turbo engine
• Larger maximum cargo capacity
• Available AWD
• More confident highway performance
• Modern interior and exterior styling
• Feels closer to a compact SUV than an economy crossover
• Better choice for growing families
• Broader range of personalities across trims

Kona Disadvantages

• Upper trims become noticeably more expensive
• Standard 2.0-litre engine isn't particularly exciting
• Aggressive styling may not appeal to everyone
• Turbo versions may consume more fuel
• Larger wheels can increase tire replacement costs

Pros and Cons of the Nissan Kicks

Kicks Advantages

• Competitive starting price
• Excellent fuel economy
• Available AWD
• Snow Mode on AWD models
• Standard heated front seats
• Standard 12.3-inch touchscreen
• Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
• Up to 1,699 L of cargo room
• Easy to manoeuvre in crowded cities
• Strong everyday value

Kicks Disadvantages

• Only 141 horsepower
• No stronger engine option
• CVT driving character won't suit everyone
• Less maximum cargo room than Kona
• Not rated for towing
• Can feel less relaxed during aggressive highway passing

Nissan's combination of a 141-hp engine, AWD availability, standard heated seats and wireless smartphone connectivity makes the Kicks unusually well specified for basic Canadian commuting.

Who Should Buy the Nissan Kicks?

We'd choose the Kicks if we:

• Primarily drive in the city
• Want to minimize fuel consumption
• Care about getting lots of standard technology
• Need AWD without moving into a larger SUV
• Value easy parking
• Don't care about rapid acceleration
• Rarely tow
• Want a practical first new vehicle

Think of the Kicks as a really good pair of everyday running shoes.

They're comfortable, efficient, lightweight, and appropriate almost everywhere.

Who Should Buy the Hyundai Kona?

We'd choose the Kona if we:

• Frequently drive on highways
• Want noticeably stronger optional performance
• Carry lots of cargo
• Take regular road trips
• Need AWD
• Want a more premium-feeling small crossover
• Plan to keep the vehicle as family needs change
• Don't mind spending more for a higher trim

The Kona is more like a high-quality hiking shoe: still usable every day, but with more capability waiting when the pavement ends or the journey becomes harder.

Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada: Which One Would We Buy?

For most buyers, we'd buy the Hyundai Kona.

It simply has more depth.

The Kicks does an admirable job of meeting essential transportation needs. In some categories—particularly standard technology, city friendliness, and efficiency—it may actually be the smarter purchase.

But the Kona gives us more cargo capacity, stronger available performance, confident highway manners, and greater versatility.

The base 2.0-litre Kona produces 147 horsepower, and its available turbo engine jumps to 190 horsepower. The Nissan remains at 141 horsepower regardless of trim.

That flexibility makes a difference.

Our Final Score

Hyundai Kona: 9/10

Nissan Kicks: 8.5/10

The gap is smaller than it once would have been.

In fact, if we were buying an inexpensive urban crossover and had no interest in performance, we might deliberately save the money and drive home in a Kicks.

If we wanted one small SUV capable of handling almost every stage of everyday Canadian life, though, we'd take the Kona.

Final Thoughts

The Hyundai Kona vs Nissan Kicks Canada battle doesn't really produce a loser.

Instead, it produces two different definitions of value.

The Nissan Kicks asks: why pay for performance we're rarely going to use?

The Hyundai Kona asks: why buy a vehicle we'll eventually wish could do more?

That distinction tells us almost everything.

For urban commuters, students, first-time buyers, and drivers watching fuel expenses closely, the Nissan Kicks is a remarkably sensible small SUV. Its modern cabin, available AWD, Snow Mode, strong standard technology, and impressive cargo flexibility turn what used to be a basic runabout into a genuinely competitive crossover. Nissan's current Canadian specifications include up to 1,699 litres of cargo room and available Intelligent AWD.

For everyone else, we'd lean toward the Hyundai Kona. It offers more cargo capacity, stronger available performance, and a broader sense of capability. Hyundai Canada currently lists the 2026 Kona from $26,749 MSRP before additional fees, and its standard engine produces 147 horsepower.

If our daily life involves crowded downtown streets and grocery runs, the Kicks may be all the SUV we'll ever need.

If our calendar includes highways, cottage weekends, airport runs, ski gear, kids, luggage, and the occasional urge to accelerate with purpose, the Kona is easier to recommend.

Sometimes the better vehicle isn't simply the one with the biggest number.

It's the one that leaves us wishing for less.

And between these two, the Kona leaves fewer boxes unchecked.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Is the Hyundai Kona better than the Nissan Kicks in Canada?

For most Canadian buyers, yes. The Hyundai Kona offers more maximum cargo space and a stronger optional engine, making it better suited to highway driving, families, and long-distance travel. However, the Nissan Kicks can be the better choice for city commuters focused on fuel economy, value, and straightforward everyday driving.

2. Which is more fuel-efficient, Hyundai Kona or Nissan Kicks?

The difference is relatively small when comparing their efficient front-wheel-drive versions. Nissan quotes the Kicks at as low as approximately 8.1 L/100 km city and 6.6 L/100 km highway, while Hyundai lists the Kona Essential FWD at roughly 8.1 city and 6.8 highway. Actual consumption varies with weather, tires, traffic, driving style, and drivetrain.

3. Does the Nissan Kicks have AWD in Canada?

Yes. The 2026 Nissan Kicks offers Intelligent All-Wheel Drive on select Canadian trims. AWD versions can also provide Snow Mode, making the Kicks considerably more useful during Canadian winters than older front-wheel-drive-only versions.

4. Which has more cargo space, Hyundai Kona or Nissan Kicks?

The Hyundai Kona has the advantage. The Kona provides approximately 723 litres behind its second row and up to 1,803 litres with the rear seats folded, while Nissan advertises up to 1,699 litres in the Kicks with its rear seats folded.

You might be interested in this content.Nissan Kicks vs Volkswagen Taos: Which Compact SUV Wins?

5. Which is better for Canadian winters, Kona or Kicks?

Both can be excellent winter vehicles when equipped with AWD and proper winter tires. The Kicks offers available Intelligent AWD and Snow Mode, while the Kona combines available AWD with considerably more optional power. We'd favour the Kicks for snowy urban commuting and the turbo Kona AWD for mixed highway and winter driving.